Lithuania vs Mauritius: Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre

Lithuania
1,773 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritius
2,003 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre
in 2022
Lithuania rank
27th
Mauritius rank
24th

Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre over time

  • Lithuania
  • Mauritius
05.0k10.0k15.0k196819952023

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 2,003 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre against 1,773 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre in Lithuania, a difference of 230 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre.

That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.1 times Lithuania's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Mauritius ahead.

Lithuania ranks 27th and Mauritius ranks 24th of 170 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Lithuania averaged higher in 1 and Mauritius in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lithuania Mauritius Difference Ahead
1990s 199.43 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre 9,113 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre 8,914 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre Mauritius
2000s 749.84 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre 4,926 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre 4,176 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre Mauritius
2010s 271.38 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre 12,519 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre 12,247 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre Mauritius
2020s 1,469 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre 1,252 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre 217.6 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre Lithuania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher arms imports (sipri trend indicator values), per square kilometre, Lithuania or Mauritius?
Mauritius, at 2,003 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre against 1,773 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre in Lithuania as of 2022.
What is the difference in arms imports (sipri trend indicator values), per square kilometre between Lithuania and Mauritius?
230 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Mauritius?
8 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2022.
How do Lithuania and Mauritius rank globally for arms imports (sipri trend indicator values), per square kilometre?
Lithuania ranks 27th and Mauritius ranks 24th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lithuania vs Mauritius: Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/arms-imports-sipri-trend-indicator-values-per-square-kilometre/lithuania/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/arms-imports-sipri-trend-indicator-values-per-square-kilometre/lithuania/mauritius/">Lithuania vs Mauritius: Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre
Unit
SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 8,996 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.