Lithuania vs New Zealand: Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre

Lithuania
1,773 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre
in 2023
New Zealand
1,538 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre
in 2023
Lithuania rank
27th
New Zealand rank
30th

Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre over time

  • Lithuania
  • New Zealand
05001.0k1.5k2.0k196119922023

How they compare

Lithuania currently reports 1,773 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre against 1,538 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre in New Zealand, a difference of 235 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre.

That makes Lithuania's figure about 1.2 times New Zealand's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 25 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Lithuania ahead.

Lithuania ranks 27th and New Zealand ranks 30th of 170 countries.

Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lithuania New Zealand Difference Ahead
1990s 329.72 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre 268.38 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre 61.34 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre Lithuania
2000s 376.92 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre 260.62 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre 116.3 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre Lithuania
2010s 344.29 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre 171.44 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre 172.85 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre Lithuania
2020s 1,653 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre 719.68 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre 933.43 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre Lithuania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher arms imports (sipri trend indicator values), per square kilometre, Lithuania or New Zealand?
Lithuania, at 1,773 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre against 1,538 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre in New Zealand as of 2023.
What is the difference in arms imports (sipri trend indicator values), per square kilometre between Lithuania and New Zealand?
235 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre, with Lithuania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and New Zealand?
25 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Lithuania and New Zealand rank globally for arms imports (sipri trend indicator values), per square kilometre?
Lithuania ranks 27th and New Zealand ranks 30th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lithuania vs New Zealand: Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/arms-imports-sipri-trend-indicator-values-per-square-kilometre/lithuania/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/arms-imports-sipri-trend-indicator-values-per-square-kilometre/lithuania/new-zealand/">Lithuania vs New Zealand: Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre
Unit
SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 8,996 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.