Lower middle income vs Serbia: Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre

Lower middle income
338.17 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre
in 2023
Serbia
4,983 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre
in 2023
Lower middle income rank
14th
Serbia rank
16th

Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre over time

  • Lower middle income
  • Serbia
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k5.0k196119922023

How they compare

Serbia currently reports 4,983 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre against 338.17 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre in Lower middle income, a difference of 4,645 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre.

That makes Serbia's figure about 14.7 times Lower middle income's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Lower middle income ahead.

Lower middle income ranks 14th and Serbia ranks 16th of 43 groups.

Across the 3 decades both report, Lower middle income averaged higher in 2 and Serbia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lower middle income Serbia Difference Ahead
2000s 212.86 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre 11.43 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre 201.43 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre Lower middle income
2010s 380.04 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre 365.88 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre 14.16 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre Lower middle income
2020s 334.71 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre 2,506 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre 2,172 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre Serbia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher arms imports (sipri trend indicator values), per square kilometre, Lower middle income or Serbia?
Serbia, at 4,983 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre against 338.17 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre in Lower middle income as of 2023.
What is the difference in arms imports (sipri trend indicator values), per square kilometre between Lower middle income and Serbia?
4,645 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre, with Serbia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lower middle income and Serbia?
11 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2023.
How do Lower middle income and Serbia rank globally for arms imports (sipri trend indicator values), per square kilometre?
Lower middle income ranks 14th and Serbia ranks 16th of 43 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lower middle income vs Serbia: Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/arms-imports-sipri-trend-indicator-values-per-square-kilometre/lower-middle-income/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/arms-imports-sipri-trend-indicator-values-per-square-kilometre/lower-middle-income/serbia/">Lower middle income vs Serbia: Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre
Unit
SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 8,996 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.