Angola vs United Kingdom: Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per unit of GDP

Angola
0.0002 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP
in 2024
United Kingdom
0.0002 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Angola rank
118th
United Kingdom rank
115th

Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per unit of GDP over time

  • Angola
  • United Kingdom
00.050.10.15196019922024

How they compare

United Kingdom currently reports 0.0002 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP against 0.0002 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP in Angola, a difference of 0 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP.

That makes United Kingdom's figure about 1.1 times Angola's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 39 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Angola ahead.

Angola ranks 118th and United Kingdom ranks 115th of 169 countries.

Angola has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola United Kingdom Difference Ahead
1980s 0.0761 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP 0.0008 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP 0.0753 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP Angola
1990s 0.0185 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP 0.0004 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP 0.0181 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP Angola
2000s 0.0047 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP 0.0003 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP 0.0044 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP Angola
2010s 0.0014 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP 0.0002 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP 0.0012 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP Angola
2020s 0.0004 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP 0.0002 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP 0.0002 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP Angola

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher arms imports (sipri trend indicator values), per unit of gdp, Angola or United Kingdom?
United Kingdom, at 0.0002 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP against 0.0002 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP in Angola as of 2024.
What is the difference in arms imports (sipri trend indicator values), per unit of gdp between Angola and United Kingdom?
0 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP, with United Kingdom ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and United Kingdom?
39 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2024.
How do Angola and United Kingdom rank globally for arms imports (sipri trend indicator values), per unit of gdp?
Angola ranks 118th and United Kingdom ranks 115th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Angola vs United Kingdom: Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 November 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/arms-imports-sipri-trend-indicator-values-per-unit-of-gdp/angola/united-kingdom/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/arms-imports-sipri-trend-indicator-values-per-unit-of-gdp/angola/united-kingdom/">Angola vs United Kingdom: Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per unit of GDP
Unit
SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
213 places, 8,924 data points, 1960–2024
Last refreshed

Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.