China vs Liberia: Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per unit of GDP

China
0 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Liberia
0 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP
in 2022
China rank
163rd
Liberia rank
164th

Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per unit of GDP over time

  • China
  • Liberia
00.020.040.06196019922024

How they compare

China currently reports 0 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP against 0 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP in Liberia, a difference of 0 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 1964 it was Liberia ahead.

China ranks 163rd and Liberia ranks 164th of 169 countries.

Liberia has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Liberia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.005 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP 0.039 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP 0.034 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP Liberia
1970s 0.0002 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP 0.0026 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP 0.0024 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP Liberia
1980s 0.0003 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP 0.0091 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP 0.0088 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP Liberia
1990s 0.0012 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP 0.005 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP 0.0039 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP Liberia
2000s 0.002 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP 0.0103 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP 0.0083 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP Liberia
2020s 0 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP 0.0002 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP 0.0001 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP Liberia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher arms imports (sipri trend indicator values), per unit of gdp, China or Liberia?
China, at 0 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP against 0 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP in Liberia as of 2024.
What is the difference in arms imports (sipri trend indicator values), per unit of gdp between China and Liberia?
0 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Liberia?
14 years are reported by both, from 1964 to 2022.
How do China and Liberia rank globally for arms imports (sipri trend indicator values), per unit of gdp?
China ranks 163rd and Liberia ranks 164th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Liberia: Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/arms-imports-sipri-trend-indicator-values-per-unit-of-gdp/china/liberia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/arms-imports-sipri-trend-indicator-values-per-unit-of-gdp/china/liberia/">China vs Liberia: Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per unit of GDP
Unit
SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
213 places, 8,924 data points, 1960–2024
Last refreshed

Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.