Kazakhstan vs Serbia: Asset-backed pensions - main database — Employee contributions

Kazakhstan
18.31 Percentage change
in 2024
Serbia
19.78 Percentage change
in 2024
Kazakhstan rank
5th
Serbia rank
4th

Asset-backed pensions - main database — Employee contributions over time

  • Kazakhstan
  • Serbia
-200204060201020172024

How they compare

Serbia currently reports 19.78 Percentage change against 18.31 Percentage change in Kazakhstan, a difference of 1.47 Percentage change.

That makes Serbia's figure about 1.1 times Kazakhstan's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2019 it was Serbia ahead.

Kazakhstan ranks 5th and Serbia ranks 4th of 31 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kazakhstan Serbia Difference Ahead
2010s 17.17 Percentage change 39.38 Percentage change 22.21 Percentage change Serbia
2020s 21.06 Percentage change 4.74 Percentage change 16.32 Percentage change Kazakhstan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher asset-backed pensions - main database — employee contributions, Kazakhstan or Serbia?
Serbia, at 19.78 Percentage change against 18.31 Percentage change in Kazakhstan as of 2024.
What is the difference in asset-backed pensions - main database — employee contributions between Kazakhstan and Serbia?
1.47 Percentage change, with Serbia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Serbia?
6 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2024.
How do Kazakhstan and Serbia rank globally for asset-backed pensions - main database — employee contributions?
Kazakhstan ranks 5th and Serbia ranks 4th of 31 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Asset-backed pensions - main database — Employee contributions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kazakhstan vs Serbia: Asset-backed pensions - main database — Employee contributions. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/asset-backed-pensions-main-database-employee-contributions/kazakhstan/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/asset-backed-pensions-main-database-employee-contributions/kazakhstan/serbia/">Kazakhstan vs Serbia: Asset-backed pensions - main database — Employee contributions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Asset-backed pensions - main database — Employee contributions
Unit
Percentage change
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
37 places, 495 data points, 1993–2024
Last refreshed

This database on asset-backed pensions is based on data collected through the OECD Global Pension Statistics exercise. Data come from various administrative sources, mainly: pension supervisory authorities, financial market authorities, ministries of finance, or national statistical offices. Data cover all asset-backed pension arrangements where assets are accumulated to back future benefit payments, except reserves of public (pay-as-you-go) pension arrangements. Asset-backed pension plans may be financed through different vehicles (such as pension funds, pension insurance contracts, bank or investment company managed funds), publicly or privately administered, mandatory or voluntary, occupational or personal, defined benefit (DB) or defined contribution (DC), for public or private-sector workers. Employers’ book reserves are also in the scope. This database includes various statistics and indicators on asset-backed pensions such as the amount of assets earmarked for retirement, the liabilities of pension providers, their revenues, their expenditure, the number of funds and plans, as well as plan membership. These statistics and indicators can be split by type of financing vehicle and type of plan.