Lithuania vs Serbia: Asset-backed pensions - main database — Employee contributions

Lithuania
16.35 Percentage change
in 2024
Serbia
19.78 Percentage change
in 2024
Lithuania rank
3rd
Serbia rank
4th

Asset-backed pensions - main database — Employee contributions over time

  • Lithuania
  • Serbia
-200204060201020172024

How they compare

Serbia currently reports 19.78 Percentage change against 16.35 Percentage change in Lithuania, a difference of 3.43 Percentage change.

That makes Serbia's figure about 1.2 times Lithuania's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Serbia ahead.

Lithuania ranks 3rd and Serbia ranks 4th of 4 countries.

Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lithuania Serbia Difference Ahead
2010s 19.54 Percentage change 13.54 Percentage change 6 Percentage change Lithuania
2020s 19.04 Percentage change 8.95 Percentage change 10.09 Percentage change Lithuania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher asset-backed pensions - main database — employee contributions, Lithuania or Serbia?
Serbia, at 19.78 Percentage change against 16.35 Percentage change in Lithuania as of 2024.
What is the difference in asset-backed pensions - main database — employee contributions between Lithuania and Serbia?
3.43 Percentage change, with Serbia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Serbia?
12 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2024.
How do Lithuania and Serbia rank globally for asset-backed pensions - main database — employee contributions?
Lithuania ranks 3rd and Serbia ranks 4th of 4 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Asset-backed pensions - main database — Employee contributions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lithuania vs Serbia: Asset-backed pensions - main database — Employee contributions. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 03 October 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/asset-backed-pensions-main-database-employee-contributions/lithuania-2/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/asset-backed-pensions-main-database-employee-contributions/lithuania-2/serbia/">Lithuania vs Serbia: Asset-backed pensions - main database — Employee contributions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Asset-backed pensions - main database — Employee contributions
Unit
Percentage change
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
37 places, 495 data points, 1993–2024
Last refreshed

This database on asset-backed pensions is based on data collected through the OECD Global Pension Statistics exercise. Data come from various administrative sources, mainly: pension supervisory authorities, financial market authorities, ministries of finance, or national statistical offices. Data cover all asset-backed pension arrangements where assets are accumulated to back future benefit payments, except reserves of public (pay-as-you-go) pension arrangements. Asset-backed pension plans may be financed through different vehicles (such as pension funds, pension insurance contracts, bank or investment company managed funds), publicly or privately administered, mandatory or voluntary, occupational or personal, defined benefit (DB) or defined contribution (DC), for public or private-sector workers. Employers’ book reserves are also in the scope. This database includes various statistics and indicators on asset-backed pensions such as the amount of assets earmarked for retirement, the liabilities of pension providers, their revenues, their expenditure, the number of funds and plans, as well as plan membership. These statistics and indicators can be split by type of financing vehicle and type of plan.