Finland vs New Zealand: Asset-backed pensions - main database — Employer contributions

Finland
-1.52 Percentage change
in 2024
New Zealand
-5.51 Percentage change
in 2013
Finland rank
24th
New Zealand rank
25th

Asset-backed pensions - main database — Employer contributions over time

  • Finland
  • New Zealand
050100150200200220132024

How they compare

Finland currently reports -1.52 Percentage change against -5.51 Percentage change in New Zealand, a difference of 3.99 Percentage change.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2005 it was New Zealand ahead.

Finland ranks 24th and New Zealand ranks 25th of 29 countries.

New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Finland New Zealand Difference Ahead
2000s 1.93 Percentage change 39.57 Percentage change 37.64 Percentage change New Zealand
2010s -0.955 Percentage change 3.19 Percentage change 4.15 Percentage change New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher asset-backed pensions - main database — employer contributions, Finland or New Zealand?
Finland, at -1.52 Percentage change against -5.51 Percentage change in New Zealand as of 2024.
What is the difference in asset-backed pensions - main database — employer contributions between Finland and New Zealand?
3.99 Percentage change, with Finland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and New Zealand?
7 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
How do Finland and New Zealand rank globally for asset-backed pensions - main database — employer contributions?
Finland ranks 24th and New Zealand ranks 25th of 29 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Asset-backed pensions - main database — Employer contributions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Finland vs New Zealand: Asset-backed pensions - main database — Employer contributions. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/asset-backed-pensions-main-database-employer-contributions/finland/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/asset-backed-pensions-main-database-employer-contributions/finland/new-zealand/">Finland vs New Zealand: Asset-backed pensions - main database — Employer contributions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Asset-backed pensions - main database — Employer contributions
Unit
Percentage change
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
35 places, 445 data points, 1993–2024
Last refreshed

This database on asset-backed pensions is based on data collected through the OECD Global Pension Statistics exercise. Data come from various administrative sources, mainly: pension supervisory authorities, financial market authorities, ministries of finance, or national statistical offices. Data cover all asset-backed pension arrangements where assets are accumulated to back future benefit payments, except reserves of public (pay-as-you-go) pension arrangements. Asset-backed pension plans may be financed through different vehicles (such as pension funds, pension insurance contracts, bank or investment company managed funds), publicly or privately administered, mandatory or voluntary, occupational or personal, defined benefit (DB) or defined contribution (DC), for public or private-sector workers. Employers’ book reserves are also in the scope. This database includes various statistics and indicators on asset-backed pensions such as the amount of assets earmarked for retirement, the liabilities of pension providers, their revenues, their expenditure, the number of funds and plans, as well as plan membership. These statistics and indicators can be split by type of financing vehicle and type of plan.