Latvia vs Mauritius: Asset-backed pensions - main database — Employer contributions

Latvia
16.37 Percentage change
in 2024
Mauritius
51.42 Percentage change
in 2023
Latvia rank
2nd
Mauritius rank
3rd

Asset-backed pensions - main database — Employer contributions over time

  • Latvia
  • Mauritius
-1000100200201020172024

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 51.42 Percentage change against 16.37 Percentage change in Latvia, a difference of 35.05 Percentage change.

That makes Mauritius's figure about 3.1 times Latvia's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Mauritius ahead.

Latvia ranks 2nd and Mauritius ranks 3rd of 6 groups.

Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latvia Mauritius Difference Ahead
2010s 6.5 Percentage change 59.09 Percentage change 52.59 Percentage change Mauritius
2020s 14.59 Percentage change 15.33 Percentage change 0.75 Percentage change Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher asset-backed pensions - main database — employer contributions, Latvia or Mauritius?
Mauritius, at 51.42 Percentage change against 16.37 Percentage change in Latvia as of 2023.
What is the difference in asset-backed pensions - main database — employer contributions between Latvia and Mauritius?
35.05 Percentage change, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Mauritius?
6 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2023.
How do Latvia and Mauritius rank globally for asset-backed pensions - main database — employer contributions?
Latvia ranks 2nd and Mauritius ranks 3rd of 6 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Asset-backed pensions - main database — Employer contributions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latvia vs Mauritius: Asset-backed pensions - main database — Employer contributions. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/asset-backed-pensions-main-database-employer-contributions/latvia-2/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/asset-backed-pensions-main-database-employer-contributions/latvia-2/mauritius/">Latvia vs Mauritius: Asset-backed pensions - main database — Employer contributions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Asset-backed pensions - main database — Employer contributions
Unit
Percentage change
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
35 places, 445 data points, 1993–2024
Last refreshed

This database on asset-backed pensions is based on data collected through the OECD Global Pension Statistics exercise. Data come from various administrative sources, mainly: pension supervisory authorities, financial market authorities, ministries of finance, or national statistical offices. Data cover all asset-backed pension arrangements where assets are accumulated to back future benefit payments, except reserves of public (pay-as-you-go) pension arrangements. Asset-backed pension plans may be financed through different vehicles (such as pension funds, pension insurance contracts, bank or investment company managed funds), publicly or privately administered, mandatory or voluntary, occupational or personal, defined benefit (DB) or defined contribution (DC), for public or private-sector workers. Employers’ book reserves are also in the scope. This database includes various statistics and indicators on asset-backed pensions such as the amount of assets earmarked for retirement, the liabilities of pension providers, their revenues, their expenditure, the number of funds and plans, as well as plan membership. These statistics and indicators can be split by type of financing vehicle and type of plan.