Latvia vs Pakistan: Asset-backed pensions - main database — Employer contributions

Latvia
16.37 Percentage change
in 2024
Pakistan
95.68 Percentage change
in 2022
Latvia rank
2nd
Pakistan rank
2nd

Asset-backed pensions - main database — Employer contributions over time

  • Latvia
  • Pakistan
0200.0k400.0k600.0k200820162024

How they compare

Pakistan currently reports 95.68 Percentage change against 16.37 Percentage change in Latvia, a difference of 79.31 Percentage change.

That makes Pakistan's figure about 5.8 times Latvia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Pakistan ahead.

Latvia ranks 2nd and Pakistan ranks 2nd of 4 groups.

Across the 2 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 1 and Pakistan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latvia Pakistan Difference Ahead
2010s -7.96 Percentage change 60.53 Percentage change 68.49 Percentage change Pakistan
2020s 15.89 Percentage change 12.01 Percentage change 3.88 Percentage change Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher asset-backed pensions - main database — employer contributions, Latvia or Pakistan?
Pakistan, at 95.68 Percentage change against 16.37 Percentage change in Latvia as of 2022.
What is the difference in asset-backed pensions - main database — employer contributions between Latvia and Pakistan?
79.31 Percentage change, with Pakistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Pakistan?
6 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2022.
How do Latvia and Pakistan rank globally for asset-backed pensions - main database — employer contributions?
Latvia ranks 2nd and Pakistan ranks 2nd of 4 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Asset-backed pensions - main database — Employer contributions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latvia vs Pakistan: Asset-backed pensions - main database — Employer contributions. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/asset-backed-pensions-main-database-employer-contributions/latvia-2/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/asset-backed-pensions-main-database-employer-contributions/latvia-2/pakistan/">Latvia vs Pakistan: Asset-backed pensions - main database — Employer contributions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Asset-backed pensions - main database — Employer contributions
Unit
Percentage change
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
35 places, 445 data points, 1993–2024
Last refreshed

This database on asset-backed pensions is based on data collected through the OECD Global Pension Statistics exercise. Data come from various administrative sources, mainly: pension supervisory authorities, financial market authorities, ministries of finance, or national statistical offices. Data cover all asset-backed pension arrangements where assets are accumulated to back future benefit payments, except reserves of public (pay-as-you-go) pension arrangements. Asset-backed pension plans may be financed through different vehicles (such as pension funds, pension insurance contracts, bank or investment company managed funds), publicly or privately administered, mandatory or voluntary, occupational or personal, defined benefit (DB) or defined contribution (DC), for public or private-sector workers. Employers’ book reserves are also in the scope. This database includes various statistics and indicators on asset-backed pensions such as the amount of assets earmarked for retirement, the liabilities of pension providers, their revenues, their expenditure, the number of funds and plans, as well as plan membership. These statistics and indicators can be split by type of financing vehicle and type of plan.