Czechia vs Denmark: Bibliometric indicators, by Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Czechia
1,128 Scientific publications
in 2024
Denmark
966.29 Scientific publications
in 2024
Czechia rank
24th
Denmark rank
27th

Bibliometric indicators, by Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) over time

  • Czechia
  • Denmark
02505007501.0k1.2k201520192024

How they compare

Czechia currently reports 1,128 Scientific publications against 966.29 Scientific publications in Denmark, a difference of 161.71 Scientific publications.

That makes Czechia's figure about 1.2 times Denmark's.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Czechia has been ahead every year.

Czechia ranks 24th and Denmark ranks 27th of 48 countries.

Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Czechia Denmark Difference Ahead
2010s 1,039 Scientific publications 826.7 Scientific publications 212.4 Scientific publications Czechia
2020s 1,103 Scientific publications 903.71 Scientific publications 199.75 Scientific publications Czechia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher bibliometric indicators, by sustainable development goals (sdgs), Czechia or Denmark?
Czechia, at 1,128 Scientific publications against 966.29 Scientific publications in Denmark as of 2024.
What is the difference in bibliometric indicators, by sustainable development goals (sdgs) between Czechia and Denmark?
161.71 Scientific publications, with Czechia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Denmark?
10 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2024.
How do Czechia and Denmark rank globally for bibliometric indicators, by sustainable development goals (sdgs)?
Czechia ranks 24th and Denmark ranks 27th of 48 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Bibliometric indicators, by Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) — Fractional counts of scientific publications. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Czechia vs Denmark: Bibliometric indicators, by Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/bibliometric-indicators-by-sustainable-development-goals-sdgs-fractional-counts-of/czechia/denmark/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/bibliometric-indicators-by-sustainable-development-goals-sdgs-fractional-counts-of/czechia/denmark/">Czechia vs Denmark: Bibliometric indicators, by Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Bibliometric indicators, by Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) — Fractional counts of scientific publications
Unit
Scientific publications
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
63 places, 630 data points, 2015–2024
Last refreshed

This dataset presents trends in the total number of scientific publications relevant to societal goals, as proxied by the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) framework, expressed in fractional counts, for the 2015–2024 period. Coverage includes OECD member and accession countries, key partners (Brazil, China, India, Indonesia, and South Africa), and other selected non-OECD economies. This is an experimental indicator, developed under the OECD’s Fundstat initiative to improve evidence on the directionality and societal relevance of research and development (R&D) activities, by linking scientific output to 17 SDGs or none. To produce this indicator, the OECD developed a probabilistic AI-assisted classification model that identifies the SDG relevance of scientific publications based on their titles and abstracts. The approach builds on insights from the OECD International Survey of Science (ISSA2021), in which researchers reported which SDG their research contributed to. Using these responses, a labelled dataset was created to fine-tune SciBERT, a large language model (LLM) pre-trained on scientific literature, enabling it to predict the probability of relevance of a given text to each of the 17 SDGs, or to none. The trained classifier is then applied to publication titles and abstracts from the Scopus Custom Data. Publication counts are fractionalised across countries and aggregated annually for comparability. For further information on the methodology, see: Aristodemou, L., et al. (2025), “Assessing the direction of R&D funding towards the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) with a new classifier and the OECD Fundstat infrastructure”, OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers. Source: OECD Bibliometric Indicators, calculations based on Elsevier's Scopus Custom Data, Elsevier, Version 1.2026. Please cite as: OECD (2026), OECD Bibliometric indicators, OECD Science, Technology and Innovation Statistics, http://oe.cd/scientometrics, accessed on xx/xx/xxxx.