How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and France?

26 years are reported by both, from 2025 to 2050.

Where does this data come from?

International Monetary Fund, published as Carbon Cost to Revenues in Disclosing Firms, Adjusted by Growth Factor, US dollar (Scope 1, Not applicable, Below 2°C). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Belgium vs France: Carbon Cost to Revenues in Disclosing Firms, Adjusted by Growth

Belgium

0.4628

in 2050

France

0.4492

in 2050

Belgium rank

30th

France rank

31st

Carbon Cost to Revenues in Disclosing Firms, Adjusted by Growth over time

Belgium
France

How they compare

Belgium currently reports 0.4628 against 0.4492 in France, a difference of 0.0136.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2025 it was France ahead.

Belgium ranks 30th and France ranks 31st of 39 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 3 and France in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Belgium	France	Difference	Ahead
2020s	0.6079	0.6102	0.0022	France
2030s	0.6615	0.5846	0.0769	Belgium
2040s	0.5404	0.4834	0.0571	Belgium
2050s	0.4628	0.4492	0.0136	Belgium

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon cost to revenues in disclosing firms, adjusted by growth, Belgium or France?: Belgium, at 0.4628 against 0.4492 in France as of 2050.
What is the difference in carbon cost to revenues in disclosing firms, adjusted by growth between Belgium and France?: 0.0136, with Belgium ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and France?: 26 years are reported by both, from 2025 to 2050.
How do Belgium and France rank globally for carbon cost to revenues in disclosing firms, adjusted by growth?: Belgium ranks 30th and France ranks 31st of 39 countries.
Where does this data come from?: International Monetary Fund, published as Carbon Cost to Revenues in Disclosing Firms, Adjusted by Growth Factor, US dollar (Scope 1, Not applicable, Below 2°C). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belgium vs France: Carbon Cost to Revenues in Disclosing Firms, Adjusted by Growth. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-cost-to-revenues-in-disclosing-firms-adjusted-by-growth-factor-us-dollar-scope-1/belgium/france/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-cost-to-revenues-in-disclosing-firms-adjusted-by-growth-factor-us-dollar-scope-1/belgium/france/">Belgium vs France: Carbon Cost to Revenues in Disclosing Firms, Adjusted by Growth</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Carbon Cost to Revenues in Disclosing Firms, Adjusted by Growth Factor, US dollar (Scope 1, Not applicable, Below 2°C)
Source: International Monetary Fund
Licence: IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage: 51 places, 1,326 data points, 2025–2050
Last refreshed: 18 August 2026

This dataset measures the impact of evolving carbon costs on firms’ financial indicators under different transition scenarios. The impacts are aggregated across countries and industries. Carbon Cost to Revenues/Assets indicators give an indication of how high these taxes will be in alternative policy scenarios in comparison to revenues/assets of the disclosing firms, along the transition through 2050. Revenues/Assets at risk indicator shows the share of firms that are expected to be severely impacted by carbon costs under the selected transition scenarios. Each indicator is calculated under two different assumptions: i) constant assets/revenues; and ii) adjusted by growth factors.