How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Germany?

26 years are reported by both, from 2025 to 2050.

Where does this data come from?

International Monetary Fund, published as Carbon Cost to Revenues in Disclosing Firms, Adjusted by Growth Factor, US dollar (Scope 1, Not applicable, Below 2°C). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Belgium vs Germany: Carbon Cost to Revenues in Disclosing Firms, Adjusted by Growth

Belgium

0.4628

in 2050

Germany

0.4677

in 2050

Belgium rank

30th

Germany rank

29th

Carbon Cost to Revenues in Disclosing Firms, Adjusted by Growth over time

Belgium
Germany

How they compare

Germany currently reports 0.4677 against 0.4628 in Belgium, a difference of 0.0049.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2025 it was Germany ahead.

Belgium ranks 30th and Germany ranks 29th of 39 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 2 and Germany in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Belgium	Germany	Difference	Ahead
2020s	0.6079	0.6778	0.0699	Germany
2030s	0.6615	0.6391	0.0224	Belgium
2040s	0.5404	0.5147	0.0257	Belgium
2050s	0.4628	0.4677	0.0049	Germany

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon cost to revenues in disclosing firms, adjusted by growth, Belgium or Germany?: Germany, at 0.4677 against 0.4628 in Belgium as of 2050.
What is the difference in carbon cost to revenues in disclosing firms, adjusted by growth between Belgium and Germany?: 0.0049, with Germany ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Germany?: 26 years are reported by both, from 2025 to 2050.
How do Belgium and Germany rank globally for carbon cost to revenues in disclosing firms, adjusted by growth?: Belgium ranks 30th and Germany ranks 29th of 39 countries.
Where does this data come from?: International Monetary Fund, published as Carbon Cost to Revenues in Disclosing Firms, Adjusted by Growth Factor, US dollar (Scope 1, Not applicable, Below 2°C). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belgium vs Germany: Carbon Cost to Revenues in Disclosing Firms, Adjusted by Growth. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-cost-to-revenues-in-disclosing-firms-adjusted-by-growth-factor-us-dollar-scope-1/belgium/germany/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-cost-to-revenues-in-disclosing-firms-adjusted-by-growth-factor-us-dollar-scope-1/belgium/germany/">Belgium vs Germany: Carbon Cost to Revenues in Disclosing Firms, Adjusted by Growth</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Carbon Cost to Revenues in Disclosing Firms, Adjusted by Growth Factor, US dollar (Scope 1, Not applicable, Below 2°C)
Source: International Monetary Fund
Licence: IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage: 51 places, 1,326 data points, 2025–2050
Last refreshed: 18 August 2026

This dataset measures the impact of evolving carbon costs on firms’ financial indicators under different transition scenarios. The impacts are aggregated across countries and industries. Carbon Cost to Revenues/Assets indicators give an indication of how high these taxes will be in alternative policy scenarios in comparison to revenues/assets of the disclosing firms, along the transition through 2050. Revenues/Assets at risk indicator shows the share of firms that are expected to be severely impacted by carbon costs under the selected transition scenarios. Each indicator is calculated under two different assumptions: i) constant assets/revenues; and ii) adjusted by growth factors.