How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Japan?

26 years are reported by both, from 2025 to 2050.

Where does this data come from?

International Monetary Fund, published as Carbon Cost to Revenues in Disclosing Firms, Adjusted by Growth Factor, US dollar (Scope 1, Not applicable, Below 2°C). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Belgium vs Japan: Carbon Cost to Revenues in Disclosing Firms, Adjusted by Growth

Belgium

0.4628

in 2050

Japan

0.5124

in 2050

Belgium rank

30th

Japan rank

27th

Carbon Cost to Revenues in Disclosing Firms, Adjusted by Growth over time

Belgium
Japan

How they compare

Japan currently reports 0.5124 against 0.4628 in Belgium, a difference of 0.0496.

That makes Japan's figure about 1.1 times Belgium's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2025 it was Belgium ahead.

Belgium ranks 30th and Japan ranks 27th of 39 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 3 and Japan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Belgium	Japan	Difference	Ahead
2020s	0.6079	0.4854	0.1225	Belgium
2030s	0.6615	0.4941	0.1674	Belgium
2040s	0.5404	0.4897	0.0508	Belgium
2050s	0.4628	0.5124	0.0496	Japan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon cost to revenues in disclosing firms, adjusted by growth, Belgium or Japan?: Japan, at 0.5124 against 0.4628 in Belgium as of 2050.
What is the difference in carbon cost to revenues in disclosing firms, adjusted by growth between Belgium and Japan?: 0.0496, with Japan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Japan?: 26 years are reported by both, from 2025 to 2050.
How do Belgium and Japan rank globally for carbon cost to revenues in disclosing firms, adjusted by growth?: Belgium ranks 30th and Japan ranks 27th of 39 countries.
Where does this data come from?: International Monetary Fund, published as Carbon Cost to Revenues in Disclosing Firms, Adjusted by Growth Factor, US dollar (Scope 1, Not applicable, Below 2°C). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belgium vs Japan: Carbon Cost to Revenues in Disclosing Firms, Adjusted by Growth. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-cost-to-revenues-in-disclosing-firms-adjusted-by-growth-factor-us-dollar-scope-1/belgium/japan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-cost-to-revenues-in-disclosing-firms-adjusted-by-growth-factor-us-dollar-scope-1/belgium/japan/">Belgium vs Japan: Carbon Cost to Revenues in Disclosing Firms, Adjusted by Growth</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Carbon Cost to Revenues in Disclosing Firms, Adjusted by Growth Factor, US dollar (Scope 1, Not applicable, Below 2°C)
Source: International Monetary Fund
Licence: IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage: 51 places, 1,326 data points, 2025–2050
Last refreshed: 18 August 2026

This dataset measures the impact of evolving carbon costs on firms’ financial indicators under different transition scenarios. The impacts are aggregated across countries and industries. Carbon Cost to Revenues/Assets indicators give an indication of how high these taxes will be in alternative policy scenarios in comparison to revenues/assets of the disclosing firms, along the transition through 2050. Revenues/Assets at risk indicator shows the share of firms that are expected to be severely impacted by carbon costs under the selected transition scenarios. Each indicator is calculated under two different assumptions: i) constant assets/revenues; and ii) adjusted by growth factors.