Denmark vs Poland: Carbon Cost to Revenues in Disclosing Firms, Adjusted by Growth
Carbon Cost to Revenues in Disclosing Firms, Adjusted by Growth over time
- Denmark
- Poland
How they compare
Denmark currently reports 3.24 against 1.73 in Poland, a difference of 1.51.
That makes Denmark's figure about 1.9 times Poland's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2025 it was Poland ahead.
Denmark ranks 5th and Poland ranks 8th of 39 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Denmark averaged higher in 2 and Poland in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Denmark | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020s | 1.74 | 3.33 | 1.59 | Poland |
| 2030s | 2.43 | 2.68 | 0.2483 | Poland |
| 2040s | 3.06 | 1.91 | 1.15 | Denmark |
| 2050s | 3.24 | 1.73 | 1.51 | Denmark |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher carbon cost to revenues in disclosing firms, adjusted by growth, Denmark or Poland?
- Denmark, at 3.24 against 1.73 in Poland as of 2050.
- What is the difference in carbon cost to revenues in disclosing firms, adjusted by growth between Denmark and Poland?
- 1.51, with Denmark ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Poland?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2025 to 2050.
- How do Denmark and Poland rank globally for carbon cost to revenues in disclosing firms, adjusted by growth?
- Denmark ranks 5th and Poland ranks 8th of 39 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Carbon Cost to Revenues in Disclosing Firms, Adjusted by Growth Factor, US dollar (Scope 1, Not applicable, Below 2°C). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset measures the impact of evolving carbon costs on firms’ financial indicators under different transition scenarios. The impacts are aggregated across countries and industries. Carbon Cost to Revenues/Assets indicators give an indication of how high these taxes will be in alternative policy scenarios in comparison to revenues/assets of the disclosing firms, along the transition through 2050. Revenues/Assets at risk indicator shows the share of firms that are expected to be severely impacted by carbon costs under the selected transition scenarios. Each indicator is calculated under two different assumptions: i) constant assets/revenues; and ii) adjusted by growth factors.