How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Korea?

26 years are reported by both, from 2025 to 2050.

Where does this data come from?

International Monetary Fund, published as Carbon Cost to Revenues in Disclosing Firms, Adjusted by Growth Factor, US dollar (Scope 1, Not applicable, Below 2°C). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Finland vs Korea: Carbon Cost to Revenues in Disclosing Firms, Adjusted by Growth

Finland

0.6194

in 2050

Korea

0.628

in 2050

Finland rank

23rd

Korea rank

22nd

Carbon Cost to Revenues in Disclosing Firms, Adjusted by Growth over time

Finland
Korea

How they compare

Korea currently reports 0.628 against 0.6194 in Finland, a difference of 0.0086.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2025 it was Finland ahead.

Finland ranks 23rd and Korea ranks 22nd of 39 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 2 and Korea in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Finland	Korea	Difference	Ahead
2020s	1.02	0.3625	0.6586	Finland
2030s	0.794	0.4195	0.3745	Finland
2040s	0.5446	0.5574	0.0128	Korea
2050s	0.6194	0.628	0.0087	Korea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon cost to revenues in disclosing firms, adjusted by growth, Finland or Korea?: Korea, at 0.628 against 0.6194 in Finland as of 2050.
What is the difference in carbon cost to revenues in disclosing firms, adjusted by growth between Finland and Korea?: 0.0086, with Korea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Korea?: 26 years are reported by both, from 2025 to 2050.
How do Finland and Korea rank globally for carbon cost to revenues in disclosing firms, adjusted by growth?: Finland ranks 23rd and Korea ranks 22nd of 39 countries.
Where does this data come from?: International Monetary Fund, published as Carbon Cost to Revenues in Disclosing Firms, Adjusted by Growth Factor, US dollar (Scope 1, Not applicable, Below 2°C). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Finland vs Korea: Carbon Cost to Revenues in Disclosing Firms, Adjusted by Growth. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-cost-to-revenues-in-disclosing-firms-adjusted-by-growth-factor-us-dollar-scope-1/finland/korea-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-cost-to-revenues-in-disclosing-firms-adjusted-by-growth-factor-us-dollar-scope-1/finland/korea-rep/">Finland vs Korea: Carbon Cost to Revenues in Disclosing Firms, Adjusted by Growth</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Carbon Cost to Revenues in Disclosing Firms, Adjusted by Growth Factor, US dollar (Scope 1, Not applicable, Below 2°C)
Source: International Monetary Fund
Licence: IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage: 51 places, 1,326 data points, 2025–2050
Last refreshed: 18 August 2026

This dataset measures the impact of evolving carbon costs on firms’ financial indicators under different transition scenarios. The impacts are aggregated across countries and industries. Carbon Cost to Revenues/Assets indicators give an indication of how high these taxes will be in alternative policy scenarios in comparison to revenues/assets of the disclosing firms, along the transition through 2050. Revenues/Assets at risk indicator shows the share of firms that are expected to be severely impacted by carbon costs under the selected transition scenarios. Each indicator is calculated under two different assumptions: i) constant assets/revenues; and ii) adjusted by growth factors.