Japan vs Spain: Carbon Cost to Revenues in Disclosing Firms, Adjusted by Growth
Carbon Cost to Revenues in Disclosing Firms, Adjusted by Growth over time
- Japan
- Spain
How they compare
Spain currently reports 0.5864 against 0.5124 in Japan, a difference of 0.074.
That makes Spain's figure about 1.1 times Japan's.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Spain has been ahead every year.
Japan ranks 27th and Spain ranks 24th of 39 countries.
Spain has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | Spain | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020s | 0.4854 | 0.7524 | 0.267 | Spain |
| 2030s | 0.4941 | 0.7232 | 0.2291 | Spain |
| 2040s | 0.4897 | 0.61 | 0.1204 | Spain |
| 2050s | 0.5124 | 0.5864 | 0.074 | Spain |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher carbon cost to revenues in disclosing firms, adjusted by growth, Japan or Spain?
- Spain, at 0.5864 against 0.5124 in Japan as of 2050.
- What is the difference in carbon cost to revenues in disclosing firms, adjusted by growth between Japan and Spain?
- 0.074, with Spain ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Spain?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2025 to 2050.
- How do Japan and Spain rank globally for carbon cost to revenues in disclosing firms, adjusted by growth?
- Japan ranks 27th and Spain ranks 24th of 39 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Carbon Cost to Revenues in Disclosing Firms, Adjusted by Growth Factor, US dollar (Scope 1, Not applicable, Below 2°C). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset measures the impact of evolving carbon costs on firms’ financial indicators under different transition scenarios. The impacts are aggregated across countries and industries. Carbon Cost to Revenues/Assets indicators give an indication of how high these taxes will be in alternative policy scenarios in comparison to revenues/assets of the disclosing firms, along the transition through 2050. Revenues/Assets at risk indicator shows the share of firms that are expected to be severely impacted by carbon costs under the selected transition scenarios. Each indicator is calculated under two different assumptions: i) constant assets/revenues; and ii) adjusted by growth factors.