New Zealand vs Switzerland: Carbon Cost to Revenues in Disclosing Firms, Adjusted by Growth
Carbon Cost to Revenues in Disclosing Firms, Adjusted by Growth over time
- New Zealand
- Switzerland
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 1.38 against 1.16 in Switzerland, a difference of 0.22.
That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.2 times Switzerland's.
Across all 26 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.
New Zealand ranks 11th and Switzerland ranks 12th of 39 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | Switzerland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020s | 0.9745 | 0.9006 | 0.0739 | New Zealand |
| 2030s | 1.16 | 1.05 | 0.1138 | New Zealand |
| 2040s | 1.27 | 1.13 | 0.1437 | New Zealand |
| 2050s | 1.38 | 1.16 | 0.2241 | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher carbon cost to revenues in disclosing firms, adjusted by growth, New Zealand or Switzerland?
- New Zealand, at 1.38 against 1.16 in Switzerland as of 2050.
- What is the difference in carbon cost to revenues in disclosing firms, adjusted by growth between New Zealand and Switzerland?
- 0.22, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Switzerland?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2025 to 2050.
- How do New Zealand and Switzerland rank globally for carbon cost to revenues in disclosing firms, adjusted by growth?
- New Zealand ranks 11th and Switzerland ranks 12th of 39 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Carbon Cost to Revenues in Disclosing Firms, Adjusted by Growth Factor, US dollar (Scope 1, Not applicable, Below 2°C). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset measures the impact of evolving carbon costs on firms’ financial indicators under different transition scenarios. The impacts are aggregated across countries and industries. Carbon Cost to Revenues/Assets indicators give an indication of how high these taxes will be in alternative policy scenarios in comparison to revenues/assets of the disclosing firms, along the transition through 2050. Revenues/Assets at risk indicator shows the share of firms that are expected to be severely impacted by carbon costs under the selected transition scenarios. Each indicator is calculated under two different assumptions: i) constant assets/revenues; and ii) adjusted by growth factors.