Russian Federation vs Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA): Carbon Cost to Revenues in Disclosing Firms, Adjusted by Growth

Russian Federation
2.73
in 2050
Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA)
1.39
in 2050
Russian Federation rank
6th
Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) rank
3rd

Carbon Cost to Revenues in Disclosing Firms, Adjusted by Growth over time

  • Russian Federation
  • Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA)
0.511.522.5202520372050

How they compare

Russian Federation currently reports 2.73 against 1.39 in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), a difference of 1.34.

That makes Russian Federation's figure about 2.0 times Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA)'s.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Russian Federation has been ahead every year.

Russian Federation ranks 6th and Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) ranks 3rd of 39 countries.

Russian Federation has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Russian Federation Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) Difference Ahead
2020s 2.48 0.4866 1.99 Russian Federation
2030s 2.53 0.8224 1.7 Russian Federation
2040s 2.65 1.24 1.41 Russian Federation
2050s 2.73 1.39 1.34 Russian Federation

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon cost to revenues in disclosing firms, adjusted by growth, Russian Federation or Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA)?
Russian Federation, at 2.73 against 1.39 in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) as of 2050.
What is the difference in carbon cost to revenues in disclosing firms, adjusted by growth between Russian Federation and Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA)?
1.34, with Russian Federation ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Russian Federation and Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA)?
26 years are reported by both, from 2025 to 2050.
How do Russian Federation and Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) rank globally for carbon cost to revenues in disclosing firms, adjusted by growth?
Russian Federation ranks 6th and Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) ranks 3rd of 39 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Carbon Cost to Revenues in Disclosing Firms, Adjusted by Growth Factor, US dollar (Scope 1, Not applicable, Below 2°C). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Russian Federation vs Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA): Carbon Cost to Revenues in Disclosing Firms, Adjusted by Growth. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-cost-to-revenues-in-disclosing-firms-adjusted-by-growth-factor-us-dollar-scope-1/russian-federation/sub-saharan-africa-ssa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-cost-to-revenues-in-disclosing-firms-adjusted-by-growth-factor-us-dollar-scope-1/russian-federation/sub-saharan-africa-ssa/">Russian Federation vs Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA): Carbon Cost to Revenues in Disclosing Firms, Adjusted by Growth</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Carbon Cost to Revenues in Disclosing Firms, Adjusted by Growth Factor, US dollar (Scope 1, Not applicable, Below 2°C)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
51 places, 1,326 data points, 2025–2050
Last refreshed

This dataset measures the impact of evolving carbon costs on firms’ financial indicators under different transition scenarios. The impacts are aggregated across countries and industries. Carbon Cost to Revenues/Assets indicators give an indication of how high these taxes will be in alternative policy scenarios in comparison to revenues/assets of the disclosing firms, along the transition through 2050. Revenues/Assets at risk indicator shows the share of firms that are expected to be severely impacted by carbon costs under the selected transition scenarios. Each indicator is calculated under two different assumptions: i) constant assets/revenues; and ii) adjusted by growth factors.