Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) vs Türkiye: Carbon Cost to Revenues in Disclosing Firms, Adjusted by Growth

Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA)
1.39
in 2050
Türkiye
4.32
in 2050
Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) rank
3rd
Türkiye rank
2nd

Carbon Cost to Revenues in Disclosing Firms, Adjusted by Growth over time

  • Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA)
  • Türkiye
012345202520372050

How they compare

Türkiye currently reports 4.32 against 1.39 in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), a difference of 2.93.

That makes Türkiye's figure about 3.1 times Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA)'s.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Türkiye has been ahead every year.

Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) ranks 3rd and Türkiye ranks 2nd of 12 groups.

Türkiye has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) Türkiye Difference Ahead
2020s 0.4866 3.41 2.93 Türkiye
2030s 0.8224 4.5 3.68 Türkiye
2040s 1.24 4.65 3.41 Türkiye
2050s 1.39 4.32 2.93 Türkiye

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon cost to revenues in disclosing firms, adjusted by growth, Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) or Türkiye?
Türkiye, at 4.32 against 1.39 in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) as of 2050.
What is the difference in carbon cost to revenues in disclosing firms, adjusted by growth between Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) and Türkiye?
2.93, with Türkiye ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) and Türkiye?
26 years are reported by both, from 2025 to 2050.
How do Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) and Türkiye rank globally for carbon cost to revenues in disclosing firms, adjusted by growth?
Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) ranks 3rd and Türkiye ranks 2nd of 12 groups.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Carbon Cost to Revenues in Disclosing Firms, Adjusted by Growth Factor, US dollar (Scope 1, Not applicable, Below 2°C). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) vs Türkiye: Carbon Cost to Revenues in Disclosing Firms, Adjusted by Growth. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-cost-to-revenues-in-disclosing-firms-adjusted-by-growth-factor-us-dollar-scope-1/sub-saharan-africa-ssa/turkiye/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-cost-to-revenues-in-disclosing-firms-adjusted-by-growth-factor-us-dollar-scope-1/sub-saharan-africa-ssa/turkiye/">Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) vs Türkiye: Carbon Cost to Revenues in Disclosing Firms, Adjusted by Growth</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Carbon Cost to Revenues in Disclosing Firms, Adjusted by Growth Factor, US dollar (Scope 1, Not applicable, Below 2°C)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
51 places, 1,326 data points, 2025–2050
Last refreshed

This dataset measures the impact of evolving carbon costs on firms’ financial indicators under different transition scenarios. The impacts are aggregated across countries and industries. Carbon Cost to Revenues/Assets indicators give an indication of how high these taxes will be in alternative policy scenarios in comparison to revenues/assets of the disclosing firms, along the transition through 2050. Revenues/Assets at risk indicator shows the share of firms that are expected to be severely impacted by carbon costs under the selected transition scenarios. Each indicator is calculated under two different assumptions: i) constant assets/revenues; and ii) adjusted by growth factors.