How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Finland?

26 years are reported by both, from 2025 to 2050.

Where does this data come from?

International Monetary Fund, published as Carbon Cost to Revenues in Disclosing Firms, US dollar (Scope 1, Not applicable, Below 2°C). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Belgium vs Finland: Carbon Cost to Revenues in Disclosing Firms, US dollar

Belgium

0.9201

in 2050

Finland

0.9327

in 2050

Belgium rank

31st

Finland rank

30th

Carbon Cost to Revenues in Disclosing Firms, US dollar over time

Belgium
Finland

How they compare

Finland currently reports 0.9327 against 0.9201 in Belgium, a difference of 0.0126.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2025 it was Finland ahead.

Belgium ranks 31st and Finland ranks 30th of 39 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 1 and Finland in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Belgium	Finland	Difference	Ahead
2020s	0.702	1.11	0.406	Finland
2030s	0.9114	0.9497	0.0383	Finland
2040s	0.9398	0.7583	0.1815	Belgium
2050s	0.9201	0.9327	0.0127	Finland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon cost to revenues in disclosing firms, us dollar, Belgium or Finland?: Finland, at 0.9327 against 0.9201 in Belgium as of 2050.
What is the difference in carbon cost to revenues in disclosing firms, us dollar between Belgium and Finland?: 0.0126, with Finland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Finland?: 26 years are reported by both, from 2025 to 2050.
How do Belgium and Finland rank globally for carbon cost to revenues in disclosing firms, us dollar?: Belgium ranks 31st and Finland ranks 30th of 39 countries.
Where does this data come from?: International Monetary Fund, published as Carbon Cost to Revenues in Disclosing Firms, US dollar (Scope 1, Not applicable, Below 2°C). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belgium vs Finland: Carbon Cost to Revenues in Disclosing Firms, US dollar. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-cost-to-revenues-in-disclosing-firms-us-dollar-scope-1-not-applicable-below-2-c/belgium/finland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-cost-to-revenues-in-disclosing-firms-us-dollar-scope-1-not-applicable-below-2-c/belgium/finland/">Belgium vs Finland: Carbon Cost to Revenues in Disclosing Firms, US dollar</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Carbon Cost to Revenues in Disclosing Firms, US dollar (Scope 1, Not applicable, Below 2°C)
Source: International Monetary Fund
Licence: IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage: 51 places, 1,326 data points, 2025–2050
Last refreshed: 18 August 2026

This dataset measures the impact of evolving carbon costs on firms’ financial indicators under different transition scenarios. The impacts are aggregated across countries and industries. Carbon Cost to Revenues/Assets indicators give an indication of how high these taxes will be in alternative policy scenarios in comparison to revenues/assets of the disclosing firms, along the transition through 2050. Revenues/Assets at risk indicator shows the share of firms that are expected to be severely impacted by carbon costs under the selected transition scenarios. Each indicator is calculated under two different assumptions: i) constant assets/revenues; and ii) adjusted by growth factors.