Chile vs Philippines: Carbon Cost to Revenues in Disclosing Firms, US dollar

Chile
3.47
in 2050
Philippines
3.6
in 2050
Chile rank
12th
Philippines rank
11th

Carbon Cost to Revenues in Disclosing Firms, US dollar over time

  • Chile
  • Philippines
11.522.533.5202520372050

How they compare

Philippines currently reports 3.6 against 3.47 in Chile, a difference of 0.13.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2025 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 12th and Philippines ranks 11th of 39 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 3 and Philippines in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Philippines Difference Ahead
2020s 1.63 1.26 0.3681 Chile
2030s 1.97 1.71 0.2526 Chile
2040s 2.66 2.61 0.0476 Chile
2050s 3.47 3.6 0.13 Philippines

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon cost to revenues in disclosing firms, us dollar, Chile or Philippines?
Philippines, at 3.6 against 3.47 in Chile as of 2050.
What is the difference in carbon cost to revenues in disclosing firms, us dollar between Chile and Philippines?
0.13, with Philippines ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Philippines?
26 years are reported by both, from 2025 to 2050.
How do Chile and Philippines rank globally for carbon cost to revenues in disclosing firms, us dollar?
Chile ranks 12th and Philippines ranks 11th of 39 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Carbon Cost to Revenues in Disclosing Firms, US dollar (Scope 1, Not applicable, Below 2°C). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Philippines: Carbon Cost to Revenues in Disclosing Firms, US dollar. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-cost-to-revenues-in-disclosing-firms-us-dollar-scope-1-not-applicable-below-2-c/chile/philippines/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-cost-to-revenues-in-disclosing-firms-us-dollar-scope-1-not-applicable-below-2-c/chile/philippines/">Chile vs Philippines: Carbon Cost to Revenues in Disclosing Firms, US dollar</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Carbon Cost to Revenues in Disclosing Firms, US dollar (Scope 1, Not applicable, Below 2°C)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
51 places, 1,326 data points, 2025–2050
Last refreshed

This dataset measures the impact of evolving carbon costs on firms’ financial indicators under different transition scenarios. The impacts are aggregated across countries and industries. Carbon Cost to Revenues/Assets indicators give an indication of how high these taxes will be in alternative policy scenarios in comparison to revenues/assets of the disclosing firms, along the transition through 2050. Revenues/Assets at risk indicator shows the share of firms that are expected to be severely impacted by carbon costs under the selected transition scenarios. Each indicator is calculated under two different assumptions: i) constant assets/revenues; and ii) adjusted by growth factors.