Colombia vs Russian Federation: Carbon Cost to Revenues in Disclosing Firms, US dollar
Carbon Cost to Revenues in Disclosing Firms, US dollar over time
- Colombia
- Russian Federation
How they compare
Russian Federation currently reports 4.71 against 3.93 in Colombia, a difference of 0.78.
That makes Russian Federation's figure about 1.2 times Colombia's.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Russian Federation has been ahead every year.
Colombia ranks 10th and Russian Federation ranks 7th of 39 countries.
Russian Federation has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Colombia | Russian Federation | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020s | 1.94 | 2.78 | 0.8365 | Russian Federation |
| 2030s | 2.51 | 3.26 | 0.75 | Russian Federation |
| 2040s | 3.34 | 4.14 | 0.798 | Russian Federation |
| 2050s | 3.93 | 4.71 | 0.7803 | Russian Federation |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher carbon cost to revenues in disclosing firms, us dollar, Colombia or Russian Federation?
- Russian Federation, at 4.71 against 3.93 in Colombia as of 2050.
- What is the difference in carbon cost to revenues in disclosing firms, us dollar between Colombia and Russian Federation?
- 0.78, with Russian Federation ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Russian Federation?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2025 to 2050.
- How do Colombia and Russian Federation rank globally for carbon cost to revenues in disclosing firms, us dollar?
- Colombia ranks 10th and Russian Federation ranks 7th of 39 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Carbon Cost to Revenues in Disclosing Firms, US dollar (Scope 1, Not applicable, Below 2°C). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset measures the impact of evolving carbon costs on firms’ financial indicators under different transition scenarios. The impacts are aggregated across countries and industries. Carbon Cost to Revenues/Assets indicators give an indication of how high these taxes will be in alternative policy scenarios in comparison to revenues/assets of the disclosing firms, along the transition through 2050. Revenues/Assets at risk indicator shows the share of firms that are expected to be severely impacted by carbon costs under the selected transition scenarios. Each indicator is calculated under two different assumptions: i) constant assets/revenues; and ii) adjusted by growth factors.