Emerging and Developing Asia vs Malaysia: Carbon Cost to Revenues in Disclosing Firms, US dollar
Carbon Cost to Revenues in Disclosing Firms, US dollar over time
- Emerging and Developing Asia
- Malaysia
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 4.94 against 3.44 in Emerging and Developing Asia, a difference of 1.5.
That makes Malaysia's figure about 1.4 times Emerging and Developing Asia's.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Malaysia has been ahead every year.
Emerging and Developing Asia ranks 4th and Malaysia ranks 5th of 12 groups.
Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Emerging and Developing Asia | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020s | 1.64 | 2.25 | 0.6108 | Malaysia |
| 2030s | 2.04 | 2.71 | 0.6701 | Malaysia |
| 2040s | 2.75 | 3.66 | 0.9121 | Malaysia |
| 2050s | 3.44 | 4.94 | 1.51 | Malaysia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher carbon cost to revenues in disclosing firms, us dollar, Emerging and Developing Asia or Malaysia?
- Malaysia, at 4.94 against 3.44 in Emerging and Developing Asia as of 2050.
- What is the difference in carbon cost to revenues in disclosing firms, us dollar between Emerging and Developing Asia and Malaysia?
- 1.5, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Emerging and Developing Asia and Malaysia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2025 to 2050.
- How do Emerging and Developing Asia and Malaysia rank globally for carbon cost to revenues in disclosing firms, us dollar?
- Emerging and Developing Asia ranks 4th and Malaysia ranks 5th of 12 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Carbon Cost to Revenues in Disclosing Firms, US dollar (Scope 1, Not applicable, Below 2°C). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset measures the impact of evolving carbon costs on firms’ financial indicators under different transition scenarios. The impacts are aggregated across countries and industries. Carbon Cost to Revenues/Assets indicators give an indication of how high these taxes will be in alternative policy scenarios in comparison to revenues/assets of the disclosing firms, along the transition through 2050. Revenues/Assets at risk indicator shows the share of firms that are expected to be severely impacted by carbon costs under the selected transition scenarios. Each indicator is calculated under two different assumptions: i) constant assets/revenues; and ii) adjusted by growth factors.