Euro Area (EA) vs Russian Federation: Carbon Cost to Revenues in Disclosing Firms, US dollar

Euro Area (EA)
1.21
in 2050
Russian Federation
4.71
in 2050
Euro Area (EA) rank
10th
Russian Federation rank
7th

Carbon Cost to Revenues in Disclosing Firms, US dollar over time

  • Euro Area (EA)
  • Russian Federation
12345202520372050

How they compare

Russian Federation currently reports 4.71 against 1.21 in Euro Area (EA), a difference of 3.5.

That makes Russian Federation's figure about 3.9 times Euro Area (EA)'s.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Russian Federation has been ahead every year.

Euro Area (EA) ranks 10th and Russian Federation ranks 7th of 12 groups.

Russian Federation has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Euro Area (EA) Russian Federation Difference Ahead
2020s 0.9543 2.78 1.83 Russian Federation
2030s 1.06 3.26 2.2 Russian Federation
2040s 1.13 4.14 3.01 Russian Federation
2050s 1.21 4.71 3.5 Russian Federation

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon cost to revenues in disclosing firms, us dollar, Euro Area (EA) or Russian Federation?
Russian Federation, at 4.71 against 1.21 in Euro Area (EA) as of 2050.
What is the difference in carbon cost to revenues in disclosing firms, us dollar between Euro Area (EA) and Russian Federation?
3.5, with Russian Federation ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Euro Area (EA) and Russian Federation?
26 years are reported by both, from 2025 to 2050.
How do Euro Area (EA) and Russian Federation rank globally for carbon cost to revenues in disclosing firms, us dollar?
Euro Area (EA) ranks 10th and Russian Federation ranks 7th of 12 groups.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Carbon Cost to Revenues in Disclosing Firms, US dollar (Scope 1, Not applicable, Below 2°C). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Euro Area (EA) vs Russian Federation: Carbon Cost to Revenues in Disclosing Firms, US dollar. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-cost-to-revenues-in-disclosing-firms-us-dollar-scope-1-not-applicable-below-2-c/euro-area-ea/russian-federation/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-cost-to-revenues-in-disclosing-firms-us-dollar-scope-1-not-applicable-below-2-c/euro-area-ea/russian-federation/">Euro Area (EA) vs Russian Federation: Carbon Cost to Revenues in Disclosing Firms, US dollar</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Carbon Cost to Revenues in Disclosing Firms, US dollar (Scope 1, Not applicable, Below 2°C)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
51 places, 1,326 data points, 2025–2050
Last refreshed

This dataset measures the impact of evolving carbon costs on firms’ financial indicators under different transition scenarios. The impacts are aggregated across countries and industries. Carbon Cost to Revenues/Assets indicators give an indication of how high these taxes will be in alternative policy scenarios in comparison to revenues/assets of the disclosing firms, along the transition through 2050. Revenues/Assets at risk indicator shows the share of firms that are expected to be severely impacted by carbon costs under the selected transition scenarios. Each indicator is calculated under two different assumptions: i) constant assets/revenues; and ii) adjusted by growth factors.