How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Italy?

26 years are reported by both, from 2025 to 2050.

Where does this data come from?

International Monetary Fund, published as Carbon Cost to Revenues in Disclosing Firms, US dollar (Scope 1, Not applicable, Below 2°C). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Hong Kong vs Italy: Carbon Cost to Revenues in Disclosing Firms, US dollar

Hong Kong

1.98

in 2050

Italy

1.74

in 2050

Hong Kong rank

17th

Italy rank

20th

Carbon Cost to Revenues in Disclosing Firms, US dollar over time

Hong Kong
Italy

How they compare

Hong Kong currently reports 1.98 against 1.74 in Italy, a difference of 0.24.

That makes Hong Kong's figure about 1.1 times Italy's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2025 it was Italy ahead.

Hong Kong ranks 17th and Italy ranks 20th of 39 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Hong Kong averaged higher in 1 and Italy in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Hong Kong	Italy	Difference	Ahead
2020s	1.02	1.65	0.6371	Italy
2030s	1.16	1.68	0.5211	Italy
2040s	1.47	1.6	0.1241	Italy
2050s	1.98	1.74	0.235	Hong Kong

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon cost to revenues in disclosing firms, us dollar, Hong Kong or Italy?: Hong Kong, at 1.98 against 1.74 in Italy as of 2050.
What is the difference in carbon cost to revenues in disclosing firms, us dollar between Hong Kong and Italy?: 0.24, with Hong Kong ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Italy?: 26 years are reported by both, from 2025 to 2050.
How do Hong Kong and Italy rank globally for carbon cost to revenues in disclosing firms, us dollar?: Hong Kong ranks 17th and Italy ranks 20th of 39 countries.
Where does this data come from?: International Monetary Fund, published as Carbon Cost to Revenues in Disclosing Firms, US dollar (Scope 1, Not applicable, Below 2°C). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong vs Italy: Carbon Cost to Revenues in Disclosing Firms, US dollar. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-cost-to-revenues-in-disclosing-firms-us-dollar-scope-1-not-applicable-below-2-c/hong-kong-sar-china/italy/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-cost-to-revenues-in-disclosing-firms-us-dollar-scope-1-not-applicable-below-2-c/hong-kong-sar-china/italy/">Hong Kong vs Italy: Carbon Cost to Revenues in Disclosing Firms, US dollar</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Carbon Cost to Revenues in Disclosing Firms, US dollar (Scope 1, Not applicable, Below 2°C)
Source: International Monetary Fund
Licence: IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage: 51 places, 1,326 data points, 2025–2050
Last refreshed: 18 August 2026

This dataset measures the impact of evolving carbon costs on firms’ financial indicators under different transition scenarios. The impacts are aggregated across countries and industries. Carbon Cost to Revenues/Assets indicators give an indication of how high these taxes will be in alternative policy scenarios in comparison to revenues/assets of the disclosing firms, along the transition through 2050. Revenues/Assets at risk indicator shows the share of firms that are expected to be severely impacted by carbon costs under the selected transition scenarios. Each indicator is calculated under two different assumptions: i) constant assets/revenues; and ii) adjusted by growth factors.