Hong Kong vs South Africa: Carbon Cost to Revenues in Disclosing Firms, US dollar
Carbon Cost to Revenues in Disclosing Firms, US dollar over time
- Hong Kong
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 2 against 1.98 in Hong Kong, a difference of 0.02.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2025 it was Hong Kong ahead.
Hong Kong ranks 17th and South Africa ranks 16th of 39 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Hong Kong averaged higher in 2 and South Africa in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020s | 1.02 | 0.4561 | 0.5611 | Hong Kong |
| 2030s | 1.16 | 0.9179 | 0.2409 | Hong Kong |
| 2040s | 1.47 | 1.64 | 0.1694 | South Africa |
| 2050s | 1.98 | 2 | 0.024 | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher carbon cost to revenues in disclosing firms, us dollar, Hong Kong or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 2 against 1.98 in Hong Kong as of 2050.
- What is the difference in carbon cost to revenues in disclosing firms, us dollar between Hong Kong and South Africa?
- 0.02, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and South Africa?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2025 to 2050.
- How do Hong Kong and South Africa rank globally for carbon cost to revenues in disclosing firms, us dollar?
- Hong Kong ranks 17th and South Africa ranks 16th of 39 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Carbon Cost to Revenues in Disclosing Firms, US dollar (Scope 1, Not applicable, Below 2°C). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset measures the impact of evolving carbon costs on firms’ financial indicators under different transition scenarios. The impacts are aggregated across countries and industries. Carbon Cost to Revenues/Assets indicators give an indication of how high these taxes will be in alternative policy scenarios in comparison to revenues/assets of the disclosing firms, along the transition through 2050. Revenues/Assets at risk indicator shows the share of firms that are expected to be severely impacted by carbon costs under the selected transition scenarios. Each indicator is calculated under two different assumptions: i) constant assets/revenues; and ii) adjusted by growth factors.