Japan vs Chinese Taipei: Carbon Cost to Revenues in Disclosing Firms, US dollar
Carbon Cost to Revenues in Disclosing Firms, US dollar over time
- Japan
- Chinese Taipei
How they compare
Japan currently reports 0.7225 against 0.7058 in Chinese Taipei, a difference of 0.0167.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Japan has been ahead every year.
Japan ranks 35th and Chinese Taipei ranks 36th of 39 countries.
Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | Chinese Taipei | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020s | 0.5208 | 0.3549 | 0.1659 | Japan |
| 2030s | 0.5785 | 0.4582 | 0.1202 | Japan |
| 2040s | 0.647 | 0.6141 | 0.0328 | Japan |
| 2050s | 0.7225 | 0.7058 | 0.0167 | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher carbon cost to revenues in disclosing firms, us dollar, Japan or Chinese Taipei?
- Japan, at 0.7225 against 0.7058 in Chinese Taipei as of 2050.
- What is the difference in carbon cost to revenues in disclosing firms, us dollar between Japan and Chinese Taipei?
- 0.0167, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Chinese Taipei?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2025 to 2050.
- How do Japan and Chinese Taipei rank globally for carbon cost to revenues in disclosing firms, us dollar?
- Japan ranks 35th and Chinese Taipei ranks 36th of 39 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Carbon Cost to Revenues in Disclosing Firms, US dollar (Scope 1, Not applicable, Below 2°C). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset measures the impact of evolving carbon costs on firms’ financial indicators under different transition scenarios. The impacts are aggregated across countries and industries. Carbon Cost to Revenues/Assets indicators give an indication of how high these taxes will be in alternative policy scenarios in comparison to revenues/assets of the disclosing firms, along the transition through 2050. Revenues/Assets at risk indicator shows the share of firms that are expected to be severely impacted by carbon costs under the selected transition scenarios. Each indicator is calculated under two different assumptions: i) constant assets/revenues; and ii) adjusted by growth factors.