South Korea vs Netherlands: Carbon Cost to Revenues in Disclosing Firms, US dollar (Scope 1, Not)
Carbon Cost to Revenues in Disclosing Firms, US dollar (Scope 1, Not) over time
- South Korea
- Netherlands
How they compare
South Korea currently reports 0.7904 against 0.7371 in Netherlands, a difference of 0.0533.
That makes South Korea's figure about 1.1 times Netherlands's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2025 it was Netherlands ahead.
South Korea ranks 33rd and Netherlands ranks 34th of 39 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, South Korea averaged higher in 1 and Netherlands in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Korea | Netherlands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020s | 0.3707 | 0.6079 | 0.2371 | Netherlands |
| 2030s | 0.4494 | 0.7341 | 0.2847 | Netherlands |
| 2040s | 0.6571 | 0.7495 | 0.0924 | Netherlands |
| 2050s | 0.7904 | 0.7371 | 0.0532 | South Korea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher carbon cost to revenues in disclosing firms, us dollar, South Korea or Netherlands?
- South Korea, at 0.7904 against 0.7371 in Netherlands as of 2050.
- What is the difference in carbon cost to revenues in disclosing firms, us dollar between South Korea and Netherlands?
- 0.0533, with South Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Korea and Netherlands?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2025 to 2050.
- How do South Korea and Netherlands rank globally for carbon cost to revenues in disclosing firms, us dollar?
- South Korea ranks 33rd and Netherlands ranks 34th of 39 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Carbon Cost to Revenues in Disclosing Firms, US dollar (Scope 1, Not applicable, Below 2°C). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset measures the impact of evolving carbon costs on firms’ financial indicators under different transition scenarios. The impacts are aggregated across countries and industries. Carbon Cost to Revenues/Assets indicators give an indication of how high these taxes will be in alternative policy scenarios in comparison to revenues/assets of the disclosing firms, along the transition through 2050. Revenues/Assets at risk indicator shows the share of firms that are expected to be severely impacted by carbon costs under the selected transition scenarios. Each indicator is calculated under two different assumptions: i) constant assets/revenues; and ii) adjusted by growth factors.