Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) vs Malaysia: Carbon Cost to Revenues in Disclosing Firms, US dollar

Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC)
2.05
in 2050
Malaysia
4.94
in 2050
Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) rank
7th
Malaysia rank
5th

Carbon Cost to Revenues in Disclosing Firms, US dollar over time

  • Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC)
  • Malaysia
12345202520372050

How they compare

Malaysia currently reports 4.94 against 2.05 in Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC), a difference of 2.89.

That makes Malaysia's figure about 2.4 times Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC)'s.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Malaysia has been ahead every year.

Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) ranks 7th and Malaysia ranks 5th of 12 groups.

Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) Malaysia Difference Ahead
2020s 0.9246 2.25 1.32 Malaysia
2030s 1.19 2.71 1.52 Malaysia
2040s 1.65 3.66 2.01 Malaysia
2050s 2.05 4.94 2.9 Malaysia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon cost to revenues in disclosing firms, us dollar, Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) or Malaysia?
Malaysia, at 4.94 against 2.05 in Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) as of 2050.
What is the difference in carbon cost to revenues in disclosing firms, us dollar between Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) and Malaysia?
2.89, with Malaysia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) and Malaysia?
26 years are reported by both, from 2025 to 2050.
How do Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) and Malaysia rank globally for carbon cost to revenues in disclosing firms, us dollar?
Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) ranks 7th and Malaysia ranks 5th of 12 groups.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Carbon Cost to Revenues in Disclosing Firms, US dollar (Scope 1, Not applicable, Below 2°C). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) vs Malaysia: Carbon Cost to Revenues in Disclosing Firms, US dollar. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-cost-to-revenues-in-disclosing-firms-us-dollar-scope-1-not-applicable-below-2-c/latin-america-and-the-caribbean-lac/malaysia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-cost-to-revenues-in-disclosing-firms-us-dollar-scope-1-not-applicable-below-2-c/latin-america-and-the-caribbean-lac/malaysia/">Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) vs Malaysia: Carbon Cost to Revenues in Disclosing Firms, US dollar</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Carbon Cost to Revenues in Disclosing Firms, US dollar (Scope 1, Not applicable, Below 2°C)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
51 places, 1,326 data points, 2025–2050
Last refreshed

This dataset measures the impact of evolving carbon costs on firms’ financial indicators under different transition scenarios. The impacts are aggregated across countries and industries. Carbon Cost to Revenues/Assets indicators give an indication of how high these taxes will be in alternative policy scenarios in comparison to revenues/assets of the disclosing firms, along the transition through 2050. Revenues/Assets at risk indicator shows the share of firms that are expected to be severely impacted by carbon costs under the selected transition scenarios. Each indicator is calculated under two different assumptions: i) constant assets/revenues; and ii) adjusted by growth factors.