Norway vs Switzerland: Carbon Cost to Revenues in Disclosing Firms, US dollar
Carbon Cost to Revenues in Disclosing Firms, US dollar over time
- Norway
- Switzerland
How they compare
Switzerland currently reports 1.53 against 1.31 in Norway, a difference of 0.22.
That makes Switzerland's figure about 1.2 times Norway's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2025 it was Norway ahead.
Norway ranks 23rd and Switzerland ranks 22nd of 39 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Norway averaged higher in 2 and Switzerland in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Norway | Switzerland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020s | 1.09 | 0.9539 | 0.1396 | Norway |
| 2030s | 1.28 | 1.19 | 0.0896 | Norway |
| 2040s | 1.34 | 1.42 | 0.074 | Switzerland |
| 2050s | 1.31 | 1.53 | 0.2155 | Switzerland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher carbon cost to revenues in disclosing firms, us dollar, Norway or Switzerland?
- Switzerland, at 1.53 against 1.31 in Norway as of 2050.
- What is the difference in carbon cost to revenues in disclosing firms, us dollar between Norway and Switzerland?
- 0.22, with Switzerland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Norway and Switzerland?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2025 to 2050.
- How do Norway and Switzerland rank globally for carbon cost to revenues in disclosing firms, us dollar?
- Norway ranks 23rd and Switzerland ranks 22nd of 39 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Carbon Cost to Revenues in Disclosing Firms, US dollar (Scope 1, Not applicable, Below 2°C). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset measures the impact of evolving carbon costs on firms’ financial indicators under different transition scenarios. The impacts are aggregated across countries and industries. Carbon Cost to Revenues/Assets indicators give an indication of how high these taxes will be in alternative policy scenarios in comparison to revenues/assets of the disclosing firms, along the transition through 2050. Revenues/Assets at risk indicator shows the share of firms that are expected to be severely impacted by carbon costs under the selected transition scenarios. Each indicator is calculated under two different assumptions: i) constant assets/revenues; and ii) adjusted by growth factors.