Which has higher carbon cost to revenues in disclosing firms, us dollar, Taiwan or United Kingdom?

Taiwan, at 0.7058 against 0.6762 in United Kingdom as of 2050.

How many years of comparable data are there for Taiwan and United Kingdom?

26 years are reported by both, from 2025 to 2050.

Where does this data come from?

International Monetary Fund, published as Carbon Cost to Revenues in Disclosing Firms, US dollar (Scope 1, Not applicable, Below 2°C). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Taiwan vs United Kingdom: Carbon Cost to Revenues in Disclosing Firms, US dollar (Scope 1, Not)

Taiwan

0.7058

in 2050

United Kingdom

0.6762

in 2050

Taiwan rank

36th

United Kingdom rank

38th

Carbon Cost to Revenues in Disclosing Firms, US dollar (Scope 1, Not) over time

Taiwan
United Kingdom

How they compare

Taiwan currently reports 0.7058 against 0.6762 in United Kingdom, a difference of 0.0296.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2025 it was United Kingdom ahead.

Taiwan ranks 36th and United Kingdom ranks 38th of 39 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Taiwan averaged higher in 1 and United Kingdom in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Taiwan	United Kingdom	Difference	Ahead
2020s	0.3549	0.423	0.0681	United Kingdom
2030s	0.4582	0.5197	0.0615	United Kingdom
2040s	0.6141	0.6176	0.0034	United Kingdom
2050s	0.7058	0.6762	0.0296	Taiwan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon cost to revenues in disclosing firms, us dollar, Taiwan or United Kingdom?: Taiwan, at 0.7058 against 0.6762 in United Kingdom as of 2050.
What is the difference in carbon cost to revenues in disclosing firms, us dollar between Taiwan and United Kingdom?: 0.0296, with Taiwan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Taiwan and United Kingdom?: 26 years are reported by both, from 2025 to 2050.
How do Taiwan and United Kingdom rank globally for carbon cost to revenues in disclosing firms, us dollar?: Taiwan ranks 36th and United Kingdom ranks 38th of 39 countries.
Where does this data come from?: International Monetary Fund, published as Carbon Cost to Revenues in Disclosing Firms, US dollar (Scope 1, Not applicable, Below 2°C). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Taiwan vs United Kingdom: Carbon Cost to Revenues in Disclosing Firms, US dollar. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 08 November 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-cost-to-revenues-in-disclosing-firms-us-dollar-scope-1-not-applicable-below-2-c/taiwan/united-kingdom/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-cost-to-revenues-in-disclosing-firms-us-dollar-scope-1-not-applicable-below-2-c/taiwan/united-kingdom/">Taiwan vs United Kingdom: Carbon Cost to Revenues in Disclosing Firms, US dollar</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Carbon Cost to Revenues in Disclosing Firms, US dollar (Scope 1, Not applicable, Below 2°C)
Source: International Monetary Fund
Licence: IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage: 51 places, 1,326 data points, 2025–2050
Last refreshed: 18 August 2026

This dataset measures the impact of evolving carbon costs on firms’ financial indicators under different transition scenarios. The impacts are aggregated across countries and industries. Carbon Cost to Revenues/Assets indicators give an indication of how high these taxes will be in alternative policy scenarios in comparison to revenues/assets of the disclosing firms, along the transition through 2050. Revenues/Assets at risk indicator shows the share of firms that are expected to be severely impacted by carbon costs under the selected transition scenarios. Each indicator is calculated under two different assumptions: i) constant assets/revenues; and ii) adjusted by growth factors.