Israel vs Palau: Compensation of employees, Ratio of this level of government's
Compensation of employees, Ratio of this level of government's over time
- Israel
- Palau
How they compare
Israel currently reports 0.8254 against 0.803 in Palau, a difference of 0.0224.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Palau ahead.
Israel ranks 23rd and Palau ranks 24th of 79 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Israel averaged higher in 1 and Palau in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Israel | Palau | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.8354 | 0.888 | 0.0526 | Palau |
| 2010s | 0.8362 | 0.8121 | 0.0242 | Israel |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher compensation of employees, ratio of this level of government's, Israel or Palau?
- Israel, at 0.8254 against 0.803 in Palau as of 2020.
- What is the difference in compensation of employees, ratio of this level of government's between Israel and Palau?
- 0.0224, with Israel ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Palau?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Israel and Palau rank globally for compensation of employees, ratio of this level of government's?
- Israel ranks 23rd and Palau ranks 24th of 79 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Compensation of employees, Ratio of this level of government's expenditure on this item to total general government expenditure on this, Percent (Central government). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fiscal Decentralization dataset includes fiscal decentralization indicators for a sample of IMF member countries. The following indicators are included in the dataset: Revenue and Expenditure Decentralization Shares; Transfer dependency and Vertical Fiscal Imbalances; Deficit and Debt; Allocation of expenditure (economic classification); Allocation of expenditure (functional classification); Allocation of non-Tax Revenues; and Allocation of Taxes.