Andorra vs Indonesia: Competitive elections
Andorra
1
in 2025
Indonesia
1
in 2025
Andorra rank
1st
Indonesia rank
1st
Competitive elections over time
- Andorra
- Indonesia
How they compare
Andorra currently reports 1 against 1 in Indonesia, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 212 shared years of data; in 1814 it was Indonesia ahead.
Andorra ranks 1st and Indonesia ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Andorra has averaged higher in every one of the 22 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Andorra | Indonesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1810s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1820s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1830s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1840s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1850s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1860s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1870s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1880s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1920s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 0.7 | 0.1 | 0.6 | Andorra |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitive elections, Andorra or Indonesia?
- Andorra, at 1 against 1 in Indonesia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in competitive elections between Andorra and Indonesia?
- 0, with Andorra ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Andorra and Indonesia?
- 212 years are reported by both, from 1814 to 2025.
- How do Andorra and Indonesia rank globally for competitive elections?
- Andorra ranks 1st and Indonesia ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitive elections. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Whether the outcomes of elections are uncertain because their timing is not violated, voters are not systematically coerced, and election fraud is not consequential.