Barbados vs Indonesia: Competitive elections
Barbados
1
in 2025
Indonesia
1
in 2025
Barbados rank
1st
Indonesia rank
1st
Competitive elections over time
- Barbados
- Indonesia
How they compare
Barbados currently reports 1 against 1 in Indonesia, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 187 shared years of data; in 1839 it was Indonesia ahead.
Barbados ranks 1st and Indonesia ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Barbados has averaged higher in every one of the 20 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | Indonesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1830s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1840s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1850s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1860s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1870s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1880s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1920s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 0.9 | 0 | 0.9 | Barbados |
| 1970s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Barbados |
| 1980s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Barbados |
| 1990s | 1 | 0.1 | 0.9 | Barbados |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitive elections, Barbados or Indonesia?
- Barbados, at 1 against 1 in Indonesia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in competitive elections between Barbados and Indonesia?
- 0, with Barbados ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Indonesia?
- 187 years are reported by both, from 1839 to 2025.
- How do Barbados and Indonesia rank globally for competitive elections?
- Barbados ranks 1st and Indonesia ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitive elections. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Whether the outcomes of elections are uncertain because their timing is not violated, voters are not systematically coerced, and election fraud is not consequential.