Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Peru: Competitive elections
Bosnia and Herzegovina
1
in 2025
Peru
1
in 2025
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
1st
Peru rank
1st
Competitive elections over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Peru
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 1 against 1 in Peru, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 108 shared years of data; in 1918 it was Peru ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 1st and Peru ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Across the 12 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 3 and Peru in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1920s | 0.9 | 0 | 0.9 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 1930s | 0 | 0.3 | 0.3 | Peru |
| 1940s | 0 | 0.8 | 0.8 | Peru |
| 1950s | 0 | 0.4 | 0.4 | Peru |
| 1960s | 0 | 0.7 | 0.7 | Peru |
| 1970s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Peru |
| 1990s | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.2 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2000s | 1 | 0.9 | 0.1 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitive elections, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Peru?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 1 against 1 in Peru as of 2025.
- What is the difference in competitive elections between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Peru?
- 0, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Peru?
- 108 years are reported by both, from 1918 to 2025.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Peru rank globally for competitive elections?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 1st and Peru ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitive elections. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Whether the outcomes of elections are uncertain because their timing is not violated, voters are not systematically coerced, and election fraud is not consequential.