Brazil vs Marshall Islands: Competitive elections
Brazil
1
in 2025
Marshall Islands
1
in 2025
Brazil rank
1st
Marshall Islands rank
1st
Competitive elections over time
- Brazil
- Marshall Islands
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 1 against 1 in Marshall Islands, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 151 shared years of data; in 1875 it was Marshall Islands ahead.
Brazil ranks 1st and Marshall Islands ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Across the 16 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 3 and Marshall Islands in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Marshall Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1870s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1880s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1920s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 0.5 | 0 | 0.5 | Brazil |
| 1950s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Brazil |
| 1960s | 0.4 | 0 | 0.4 | Brazil |
| 1970s | 0 | 0.1 | 0.1 | Marshall Islands |
| 1980s | 0.5 | 1 | 0.5 | Marshall Islands |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitive elections, Brazil or Marshall Islands?
- Brazil, at 1 against 1 in Marshall Islands as of 2025.
- What is the difference in competitive elections between Brazil and Marshall Islands?
- 0, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Marshall Islands?
- 151 years are reported by both, from 1875 to 2025.
- How do Brazil and Marshall Islands rank globally for competitive elections?
- Brazil ranks 1st and Marshall Islands ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitive elections. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Whether the outcomes of elections are uncertain because their timing is not violated, voters are not systematically coerced, and election fraud is not consequential.