Costa Rica vs Finland: Competitive elections
Costa Rica
1
in 2025
Finland
1
in 2025
Costa Rica rank
1st
Finland rank
1st
Competitive elections over time
- Costa Rica
- Finland
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 1 against 1 in Finland, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 188 shared years of data; in 1838 it was Finland ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 1st and Finland ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Across the 20 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 2 and Finland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Finland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1830s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1840s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1850s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1860s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1870s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1880s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1900s | 0.9 | 0 | 0.9 | Costa Rica |
| 1910s | 0.8 | 0.1 | 0.7 | Costa Rica |
| 1920s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 0.9 | 1 | 0.1 | Finland |
| 1950s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitive elections, Costa Rica or Finland?
- Costa Rica, at 1 against 1 in Finland as of 2025.
- What is the difference in competitive elections between Costa Rica and Finland?
- 0, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Finland?
- 188 years are reported by both, from 1838 to 2025.
- How do Costa Rica and Finland rank globally for competitive elections?
- Costa Rica ranks 1st and Finland ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitive elections. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Whether the outcomes of elections are uncertain because their timing is not violated, voters are not systematically coerced, and election fraud is not consequential.