Ecuador vs Romania: Competitive elections
Ecuador
1
in 2025
Romania
1
in 2025
Ecuador rank
1st
Romania rank
1st
Competitive elections over time
- Ecuador
- Romania
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 1 against 1 in Romania, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 196 shared years of data; in 1830 it was Romania ahead.
Ecuador ranks 1st and Romania ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Across the 20 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 7 and Romania in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1830s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1840s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1850s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1860s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1870s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1880s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 0 | 0.1 | 0.1 | Romania |
| 1920s | 0 | 0.2 | 0.2 | Romania |
| 1930s | 0.2 | 0 | 0.2 | Ecuador |
| 1940s | 0.4 | 0 | 0.4 | Ecuador |
| 1950s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Ecuador |
| 1960s | 0.5 | 0 | 0.5 | Ecuador |
| 1970s | 0.1 | 0 | 0.1 | Ecuador |
| 1980s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Ecuador |
| 1990s | 1 | 0.8 | 0.2 | Ecuador |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitive elections, Ecuador or Romania?
- Ecuador, at 1 against 1 in Romania as of 2025.
- What is the difference in competitive elections between Ecuador and Romania?
- 0, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Romania?
- 196 years are reported by both, from 1830 to 2025.
- How do Ecuador and Romania rank globally for competitive elections?
- Ecuador ranks 1st and Romania ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitive elections. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Whether the outcomes of elections are uncertain because their timing is not violated, voters are not systematically coerced, and election fraud is not consequential.