Hungary vs New Zealand: Competitive elections
Hungary
1
in 2025
New Zealand
1
in 2025
Hungary rank
1st
New Zealand rank
1st
Competitive elections over time
- Hungary
- New Zealand
How they compare
Hungary currently reports 1 against 1 in New Zealand, a difference of 0.
Across all 159 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.
Hungary ranks 1st and New Zealand ranks 1st of 198 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 17 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hungary | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1860s | 0 | 1 | 1 | New Zealand |
| 1870s | 0 | 1 | 1 | New Zealand |
| 1880s | 0 | 1 | 1 | New Zealand |
| 1890s | 0 | 1 | 1 | New Zealand |
| 1900s | 0 | 1 | 1 | New Zealand |
| 1910s | 0 | 1 | 1 | New Zealand |
| 1920s | 0 | 1 | 1 | New Zealand |
| 1930s | 0 | 1 | 1 | New Zealand |
| 1940s | 0 | 1 | 1 | New Zealand |
| 1950s | 0 | 1 | 1 | New Zealand |
| 1960s | 0 | 1 | 1 | New Zealand |
| 1970s | 0 | 1 | 1 | New Zealand |
| 1980s | 0 | 1 | 1 | New Zealand |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitive elections, Hungary or New Zealand?
- Hungary, at 1 against 1 in New Zealand as of 2025.
- What is the difference in competitive elections between Hungary and New Zealand?
- 0, with Hungary ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and New Zealand?
- 159 years are reported by both, from 1867 to 2025.
- How do Hungary and New Zealand rank globally for competitive elections?
- Hungary ranks 1st and New Zealand ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitive elections. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Whether the outcomes of elections are uncertain because their timing is not violated, voters are not systematically coerced, and election fraud is not consequential.