Indonesia vs Nepal: Competitive elections
Indonesia
1
in 2025
Nepal
1
in 2025
Indonesia rank
1st
Nepal rank
1st
Competitive elections over time
- Indonesia
- Nepal
How they compare
Indonesia currently reports 1 against 1 in Nepal, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 226 shared years of data; in 1800 it was Nepal ahead.
Indonesia ranks 1st and Nepal ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Across the 23 decades both report, Indonesia averaged higher in 1 and Nepal in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Indonesia | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1800s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1810s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1820s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1830s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1840s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1850s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1860s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1870s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1880s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1920s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 0.1 | 0.9 | 0.8 | Nepal |
| 2000s | 1 | 0.6 | 0.4 | Indonesia |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitive elections, Indonesia or Nepal?
- Indonesia, at 1 against 1 in Nepal as of 2025.
- What is the difference in competitive elections between Indonesia and Nepal?
- 0, with Indonesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Nepal?
- 226 years are reported by both, from 1800 to 2025.
- How do Indonesia and Nepal rank globally for competitive elections?
- Indonesia ranks 1st and Nepal ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitive elections. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Whether the outcomes of elections are uncertain because their timing is not violated, voters are not systematically coerced, and election fraud is not consequential.