Jamaica vs United Kingdom: Competitive elections
Jamaica
1
in 2025
United Kingdom
1
in 2025
Jamaica rank
1st
United Kingdom rank
1st
Competitive elections over time
- Jamaica
- United Kingdom
How they compare
Jamaica currently reports 1 against 1 in United Kingdom, a difference of 0.
Across all 142 years both countries report, United Kingdom has been ahead every year.
Jamaica ranks 1st and United Kingdom ranks 1st of 198 countries.
United Kingdom has averaged higher in every one of the 15 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jamaica | United Kingdom | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 0 | 1 | 1 | United Kingdom |
| 1890s | 0 | 1 | 1 | United Kingdom |
| 1900s | 0 | 1 | 1 | United Kingdom |
| 1910s | 0 | 1 | 1 | United Kingdom |
| 1920s | 0 | 1 | 1 | United Kingdom |
| 1930s | 0 | 1 | 1 | United Kingdom |
| 1940s | 0 | 1 | 1 | United Kingdom |
| 1950s | 0 | 1 | 1 | United Kingdom |
| 1960s | 0.8 | 1 | 0.2 | United Kingdom |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitive elections, Jamaica or United Kingdom?
- Jamaica, at 1 against 1 in United Kingdom as of 2025.
- What is the difference in competitive elections between Jamaica and United Kingdom?
- 0, with Jamaica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and United Kingdom?
- 142 years are reported by both, from 1884 to 2025.
- How do Jamaica and United Kingdom rank globally for competitive elections?
- Jamaica ranks 1st and United Kingdom ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitive elections. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Whether the outcomes of elections are uncertain because their timing is not violated, voters are not systematically coerced, and election fraud is not consequential.