Japan vs Peru: Competitive elections
Japan
1
in 2025
Peru
1
in 2025
Japan rank
1st
Peru rank
1st
Competitive elections over time
- Japan
- Peru
How they compare
Japan currently reports 1 against 1 in Peru, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 237 shared years of data; in 1789 it was Peru ahead.
Japan ranks 1st and Peru ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Across the 25 decades both report, Japan averaged higher in 7 and Peru in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1780s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1790s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1800s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1810s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1820s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1830s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1840s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1850s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1860s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1870s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1880s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 0.2 | 0 | 0.2 | Japan |
| 1920s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Japan |
| 1930s | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.1 | Peru |
| 1940s | 0 | 0.8 | 0.8 | Peru |
| 1950s | 0.8 | 0.4 | 0.4 | Japan |
| 1960s | 1 | 0.7 | 0.3 | Japan |
| 1970s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Japan |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 0.2 | 0.8 | Japan |
| 2000s | 1 | 0.9 | 0.1 | Japan |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitive elections, Japan or Peru?
- Japan, at 1 against 1 in Peru as of 2025.
- What is the difference in competitive elections between Japan and Peru?
- 0, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Peru?
- 237 years are reported by both, from 1789 to 2025.
- How do Japan and Peru rank globally for competitive elections?
- Japan ranks 1st and Peru ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitive elections. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Whether the outcomes of elections are uncertain because their timing is not violated, voters are not systematically coerced, and election fraud is not consequential.