Mauritius vs Montenegro: Competitive elections
Mauritius
1
in 2025
Montenegro
1
in 2025
Mauritius rank
1st
Montenegro rank
1st
Competitive elections over time
- Mauritius
- Montenegro
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 1 against 1 in Montenegro, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 138 shared years of data; in 1885 it was Montenegro ahead.
Mauritius ranks 1st and Montenegro ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Across the 15 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 4 and Montenegro in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1920s | 0 | 0.9 | 0.9 | Montenegro |
| 1930s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 0.2 | 0 | 0.2 | Mauritius |
| 1970s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Mauritius |
| 1980s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Mauritius |
| 1990s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Mauritius |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitive elections, Mauritius or Montenegro?
- Mauritius, at 1 against 1 in Montenegro as of 2025.
- What is the difference in competitive elections between Mauritius and Montenegro?
- 0, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Montenegro?
- 138 years are reported by both, from 1885 to 2025.
- How do Mauritius and Montenegro rank globally for competitive elections?
- Mauritius ranks 1st and Montenegro ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitive elections. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Whether the outcomes of elections are uncertain because their timing is not violated, voters are not systematically coerced, and election fraud is not consequential.