Moldova vs Montenegro: Competitive elections
Moldova
1
in 2025
Montenegro
1
in 2025
Moldova rank
1st
Montenegro rank
1st
Competitive elections over time
- Moldova
- Montenegro
How they compare
Moldova currently reports 1 against 1 in Montenegro, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 203 shared years of data; in 1800 it was Montenegro ahead.
Moldova ranks 1st and Montenegro ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Moldova has averaged higher in every one of the 21 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Moldova | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1800s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1810s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1820s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1830s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1840s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1850s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1860s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1870s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1880s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 0.6 | 0 | 0.6 | Moldova |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitive elections, Moldova or Montenegro?
- Moldova, at 1 against 1 in Montenegro as of 2025.
- What is the difference in competitive elections between Moldova and Montenegro?
- 0, with Moldova ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Moldova and Montenegro?
- 203 years are reported by both, from 1800 to 2025.
- How do Moldova and Montenegro rank globally for competitive elections?
- Moldova ranks 1st and Montenegro ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitive elections. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Whether the outcomes of elections are uncertain because their timing is not violated, voters are not systematically coerced, and election fraud is not consequential.