Montenegro vs Poland: Competitive elections
Montenegro
1
in 2025
Poland
1
in 2025
Montenegro rank
1st
Poland rank
1st
Competitive elections over time
- Montenegro
- Poland
How they compare
Montenegro currently reports 1 against 1 in Poland, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 173 shared years of data; in 1789 it was Poland ahead.
Montenegro ranks 1st and Poland ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Across the 20 decades both report, Montenegro averaged higher in 1 and Poland in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Montenegro | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1780s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1790s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1800s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1860s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1870s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1880s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 0 | 0.1429 | 0.1429 | Poland |
| 1920s | 0.9 | 0.6 | 0.3 | Montenegro |
| 1930s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 0 | 0.1 | 0.1 | Poland |
| 1990s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Poland |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitive elections, Montenegro or Poland?
- Montenegro, at 1 against 1 in Poland as of 2025.
- What is the difference in competitive elections between Montenegro and Poland?
- 0, with Montenegro ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Montenegro and Poland?
- 173 years are reported by both, from 1789 to 2025.
- How do Montenegro and Poland rank globally for competitive elections?
- Montenegro ranks 1st and Poland ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitive elections. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Whether the outcomes of elections are uncertain because their timing is not violated, voters are not systematically coerced, and election fraud is not consequential.