Nicaragua vs Serbia: Competitive elections
Nicaragua
0
in 2025
Serbia
0
in 2025
Nicaragua rank
116th
Serbia rank
116th
Competitive elections over time
- Nicaragua
- Serbia
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports 0 against 0 in Serbia, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 188 shared years of data; in 1838 it was Serbia ahead.
Nicaragua ranks 116th and Serbia ranks 116th of 198 countries.
Across the 20 decades both report, Nicaragua averaged higher in 2 and Serbia in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nicaragua | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1830s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1840s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1850s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1860s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1870s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1880s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1900s | 0 | 0.7 | 0.7 | Serbia |
| 1910s | 0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | Serbia |
| 1920s | 0.2 | 0.9 | 0.7 | Serbia |
| 1930s | 0.6 | 0 | 0.6 | Nicaragua |
| 1940s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Nicaragua |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 0.6 | 1 | 0.4 | Serbia |
| 2020s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitive elections, Nicaragua or Serbia?
- Nicaragua, at 0 against 0 in Serbia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in competitive elections between Nicaragua and Serbia?
- 0, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nicaragua and Serbia?
- 188 years are reported by both, from 1838 to 2025.
- How do Nicaragua and Serbia rank globally for competitive elections?
- Nicaragua ranks 116th and Serbia ranks 116th of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitive elections. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Whether the outcomes of elections are uncertain because their timing is not violated, voters are not systematically coerced, and election fraud is not consequential.