Paraguay vs Sweden: Competitive elections
Paraguay
1
in 2025
Sweden
1
in 2025
Paraguay rank
1st
Sweden rank
1st
Competitive elections over time
- Paraguay
- Sweden
How they compare
Paraguay currently reports 1 against 1 in Sweden, a difference of 0.
Across all 215 years both countries report, Sweden has been ahead every year.
Paraguay ranks 1st and Sweden ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 22 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Paraguay | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1810s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1820s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1830s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1840s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1850s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1860s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1870s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1880s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 0 | 0.3 | 0.3 | Sweden |
| 1920s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Sweden |
| 1930s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Sweden |
| 1940s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Sweden |
| 1950s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Sweden |
| 1960s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Sweden |
| 1970s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Sweden |
| 1980s | 0.1 | 1 | 0.9 | Sweden |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitive elections, Paraguay or Sweden?
- Paraguay, at 1 against 1 in Sweden as of 2025.
- What is the difference in competitive elections between Paraguay and Sweden?
- 0, with Paraguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Paraguay and Sweden?
- 215 years are reported by both, from 1811 to 2025.
- How do Paraguay and Sweden rank globally for competitive elections?
- Paraguay ranks 1st and Sweden ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitive elections. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Whether the outcomes of elections are uncertain because their timing is not violated, voters are not systematically coerced, and election fraud is not consequential.