San Marino vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Competitive elections
San Marino
1
in 2025
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
1
in 2025
San Marino rank
1st
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank
1st
Competitive elections over time
- San Marino
- Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
How they compare
San Marino currently reports 1 against 1 in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 75 shared years of data; in 1951 it was San Marino ahead.
San Marino ranks 1st and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 1st of 198 countries.
San Marino has averaged higher in every one of the 8 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | San Marino | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 1 | 0 | 1 | San Marino |
| 1960s | 1 | 0.1 | 0.9 | San Marino |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitive elections, San Marino or Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- San Marino, at 1 against 1 in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines as of 2025.
- What is the difference in competitive elections between San Marino and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- 0, with San Marino ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for San Marino and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- 75 years are reported by both, from 1951 to 2025.
- How do San Marino and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank globally for competitive elections?
- San Marino ranks 1st and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitive elections. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Whether the outcomes of elections are uncertain because their timing is not violated, voters are not systematically coerced, and election fraud is not consequential.