United Kingdom vs Zambia: Competitive elections
United Kingdom
1
in 2025
Zambia
1
in 2025
United Kingdom rank
1st
Zambia rank
1st
Competitive elections over time
- United Kingdom
- Zambia
How they compare
United Kingdom currently reports 1 against 1 in Zambia, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 115 shared years of data; in 1911 it was United Kingdom ahead.
United Kingdom ranks 1st and Zambia ranks 1st of 198 countries.
United Kingdom has averaged higher in every one of the 12 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | United Kingdom | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 1 | 0 | 1 | United Kingdom |
| 1920s | 1 | 0 | 1 | United Kingdom |
| 1930s | 1 | 0 | 1 | United Kingdom |
| 1940s | 1 | 0 | 1 | United Kingdom |
| 1950s | 1 | 0 | 1 | United Kingdom |
| 1960s | 1 | 0 | 1 | United Kingdom |
| 1970s | 1 | 0 | 1 | United Kingdom |
| 1980s | 1 | 0 | 1 | United Kingdom |
| 1990s | 1 | 0.9 | 0.1 | United Kingdom |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 0.6 | 0.4 | United Kingdom |
| 2020s | 1 | 0.8333 | 0.1667 | United Kingdom |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitive elections, United Kingdom or Zambia?
- United Kingdom, at 1 against 1 in Zambia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in competitive elections between United Kingdom and Zambia?
- 0, with United Kingdom ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for United Kingdom and Zambia?
- 115 years are reported by both, from 1911 to 2025.
- How do United Kingdom and Zambia rank globally for competitive elections?
- United Kingdom ranks 1st and Zambia ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitive elections. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Whether the outcomes of elections are uncertain because their timing is not violated, voters are not systematically coerced, and election fraud is not consequential.